Why It's Written "In the Name 'Of' Jesus"

A Biblical prophecy (Exo. 4:6-8) suggests the person we call Jesus was a boy (adult sperm producer of mankind) of color diseased to become leprous as snow meaning it was taught he was white. The Bible is a book of Metaphors, Allegories, Parables and Symbol-types (MAPS) and the Old Testament MAPS things in the New Testament and together they MAPS end-time events. In learning to interpret them, only possible after being born again, one is able to see the Bible’s actual meaning. Together they teach that everything done is being done by god as Isaiah 45:7 saying I form light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the lord do [present tense] all these things through us. So its the intended will of god and and is purposely done to cause the designed purpose for this civilization to be manifested in its time.

Understanding that hunters, as Esau was, are outdoorsman and the sun darkens their skin while tent dwellers, as Jacob was, would loose color from not getting sun. Written is the two struggled in the womb symbolizes Africans and European human have always had dissension between them. A glimpse was shown before their birth (Gen. 12:11-13) when Abram believed his life would be endangered because of his wife Sarai's fair skin as they were approaching Khemet that Israelites renamed Egypt because of being enslaved there. Understanding that we see Esau and Jacob's dissension represents those two ethnic and know that it has always been in force.

The Bible doesn’t describe Leah's nor Rachel’s skin colors but the probability is the two girls were not by the same mother. Laban means light yet Leah’s mother may have been a dark-skin girl (an adult egg producer of mankind). Thus Jacob symbolizes Europeans but most of his children were by Leah, probably a servant's daughter, suggests they had strong African gene making eleven of his children to be of color. That allows us to say Joseph and Benjamin were fair skinned. The probability is all of Jacob’s children except Rachel’s Joseph and Benjamin were of color provides a solid reason the 10 brothers hated Joseph enough to sell him into Egypt, along with his dream’s interpretation.

To this day there is dissension between Africans and Europeans and the man called Jesus was foretold to be a Rod of the stem of Jesse (Isa. 11:1) whose family linkage was not to Rachel, thus, he who is biblically called Jesus was a man of color. It was not until after his ascension as the gospel was spread abroad did his color became leprous by teaching him as a European about a hundred years later. By teaching him as white Constantine was able to make Christianity Rome’s religion which required keeping him as a fair skinned boy. Thus, the biblical person of Jesus remains diseased as snow to this day.

How the name was chosen I know not but Janus is the name of a Roman god and Zeus the name of a Greek god so maybe they made the name by merging the two. It may have always been a Spanish name Rome profaned the pronunciation of or the Nicene Council may have given it to Spain for a deception, but what we do know is it isn’t found anywhere in the Hebrew language.

Throughout the New Testament we find written in the name of Jesus and in Jesus’ name but in no place do we find in the name Jesus. In the English language the word of connotes belonging to whereas without it it's saying that it is the name. So if Jesus is the name, as Christians say it is, why isn’t it written in the name Jesus reflecting it is his name instead of using the word of?

When looking at Jesus’ words in the Gospels he says both I the son of man (Mat. 16:13-16) and other times only the son of man (Mat. 12:39-40 & 17:11-12). The latter suggests he may be also referring to someone other than himself as often done throughout the Bible. What’s said in Matthew 16 intended to ensure there was no misunderstanding he was talking about himself while the other two appears to be intentionally deceptive because it was about him and someone else. The following is why.

Matthew 27:45-28:1 shows Jesus died somewhere around the ninth hour Friday (3 pm CE time) and was out of the earth by dawn Sunday. But with Matthew 12:40 reading for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth it doesn't match Jesus's grave time. His entering the ground time being pre-sunset Friday to his resurrection's time about dawn Sunday is an error since from Friday night until pre-dawn Sunday is two nights and one day. Also, in Matthew 17:11-12 it appears he didn’t want people to know Elijah is to be the second messiah, especially since Revelation 19:12C reads, he had a name written that no man knew but he himself . That suggests it was intended to misdirect as Isaiah 45:7 shows God do things like that. Those examples proves in the name of Jesus is written as a pseudonym for both the Rod and Branch messiahs said recorded in Isaiah 11:1. And note how the root (that grew out from the land of Israel and spun up someplace else) of Jesse appears about 1948 when Israel's old nation was renamed Israel.

Let us now look at an Old Testament type to see if we can discover the crucified messiah’s name.

Israel’s entering Canaan is a prophetic type everyone entering the spiritual promise, Moses brought them out of bondage, across the red sea and to Canaan’s border but did not enter (Deut. 32:52). Will that be the same with the prophet like him (Deut. 18:15 & 18), Elijah. Elijah will be the landowner (Mat. 20:1-16) in the paymaster parable seeking workers during the last days, as the prophet like Moses, to protect them from the Red Sea of blood during the world ending battle (Rev. 16:14) by gathering five wise virgins (Mat. 25:1-12) in Armageddon (Rev. 16:15-16) and leading them into the wilderness (the first millenniums) where they give birth to the dead in Christ foolish virgins from the last material world’s end (Rev. 6:9-11). They are to replace the five dying during this world's end (Rev. 14:13) and together they give birth the rest of the discarnated (Rev. 20:5). Those who discarnate during Israel’s 40-year wilderness stay and Moses MAPS those who are to be raptured (Num. 14:1-33) while those born to replenish the earth for the coming civilization were represented by their replacements who went in Canaan and Joshua MAPS Elijah. Thus, Elijah does not enter tithe Spiritual promised land with the raptured, he becomes the Alpha and Omega.

God appointed Old Testament Yoshua to take Israel into Canaan and Yoshua, we called Jesus, to take spiritual Israel into their promise. According to John 14:3-4 he scouts it and reveal man don’t enter the promised land after discarnating, they must have bodies functioning like his post resurrection body to enter it. That is why Jesus is the paymaster paying spiritual Israel with the rapture beginning with the last spiritually born and working his way to Elijah who becomes Alpha and Omega after sixth millenniums of replenishing this earth and its rejuvenation to look like a new heaven and new earth where earth and human are alternate bodies (Rev. 21:1-4).

Another reason his name would have been Yoshua is because Matthew 28:19 reads in part go ye, baptizing them in the name of the father, and of the son, and of the Holy Ghost saying the son’s and Holy Ghost’s names includes the father’s. The definition of father’s name as provided in Exodus 3:14 is I AM THAT I AM: the Yo in Yoshua is an abbreviation of Yohuweh, I AM THAT I AM by definition, and the jah in Elijah reflects the father’s I AM THAT I AM name who shall become the Holy Ghost (a whole man doing what ghosts do after his resurrection) means I AM THAT I AM. Therefore two messiahs are necessary to fulfill the prophecies. The go ye in Matthew 28:19 suggests Jesus had been a wanderer prior to becoming the historical messiah to Israel and Elijah will prior to becoming the messiah to Judah of prophecy (Gen. 49:1 & 8-12). So when Jesus said follow me as Exodus 4:8 and Matthew 17:5’s hear ye him suggests, both messiahs’ examples are to be followed for entering the promise. Only a few Jews followed Joshua and no more than the 5 of the 10 (10% of the end-time population) virgins will follow Elijah into Armageddon to replenish the earth after the Red Sea of man's blood.

I’ve often wondered what the definition of Jesus was and where it came from. Spanish speakers say it is the name of the Lord and Savior but have not given me a definition. As said in An Educated Guesses Based On History And Bible, how the name was chosen I know not but I’ve had an earnest desire to know. It is written ask and it shall be given, knock and the door shall be opened unto you and seek and ye shall find which is saying, have an unwavering desire for it and it will be obtained.

In 1977 I searched a dictionary of Hebrew to English names for a name translating to Jesus but found none. I've since discovered the man called Jesus in English should have been the English name Joshua in Hebrew. Now that I have found two French words Je meaning I and Suis meaning Am Because You Are. I suggest it could be a Nicene Council’s development by removing the i out of suis and united them into Jesus and then gave it to the Spanish to use as a name. Now I have found a source saying Iesus is a translation of the Greek name Iesous a transliteration of the Hebrew name Joshua. Joshua is defined I AM THAT I AM Saves. That would make the son's name in Matthew 28:19's Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost to have a name common tho the father. That may be the solution to the mystery.

With the United States of America being the Bible’s Mystery Babylon, with Babylon meaning to babble and her schools and dictionaries intentionally to cause the people to misunderstand words, I must confess I am confused. Since spirit hasn’t shown me which name to use I believe it’s to remain in use until the wise virgins enter Armageddon.

I believe the Nicene Council of the CE year 325 in Nicaea united the French word Je with Suis and had Spain to include the name pronounced hey Zeus in their language without its meaning. They arranged for the name to be mentioned a few times in history to appear historic and changed some Hebrew days representing him to match The Pagan Book of Days celebrations in Is Christ The Reason For The Season.

We must know Bible names' and words' definitions and the fact that the Bible is a book of MAPS before its revelation is obtainable, without the definitions since human preach words without any vision of their meanings we have no concept of the message. Therefore, as presented, the purpose for the Bible’s reading In the name 'of' Jesus is because it’s a pseudonym for the two different messiahs Exodus 4:6-8 gives as a first and latter signs along with many others prophecies. Thus, we are to look for Elijah the messiah to learn how he lived, follow his example (Isa. 7:14-22) for entering the promise we called heaven and everlasting life. Until Elijah enters his temple (Mal. 3:1B) few if any (Rev. 19:12) will know who he is.